Come Fly With Me

When I started out with this blog my intention was to scribe my discoveries and experiences of New York. The trouble is I’ve had scant chance to do any discovering and experiencing since I’ve been there. Every time I start to get settled I get wrenched off across the Atlantic and quite often beyond that; these very words are being written 1695 miles away, it’s -52 degC outside and I’m at the very unnatural height of 37000 feet travelling at the very unnatural speed of 552mph. Today I’ve learnt that the town of Umanak in Greenland was settled in 1763 as a sealing port. What an education this is.

I’ve spent 52 hours in the air these past thirteen days – FIFTY-TWO! If I was a dog that would be a total of 15 days in the sky, which is two days more than I’ve actually been away for. Confused? Imagine how I feel. It's a long time to be in the company of one's own thoughts – although I guess it would be a dream scenario for a schizophrenic. I’ve reached the stage where I’m actually asking the flight crew ridiculous questions like what hotels they prefer in different cities, or how they stop their skin from peeling off due to the dry recycled air, or how much fuel we’ve consumed on a specific sector - and then I’ve walked around the aircraft counting the number of passengers in order to calculate fuel consumptions. For example: the flight I was on a couple of days ago used 50,000kg of fuel. It only had 48 passengers on board. That’s 1042kg of fuel burnt per person – about 388 gallons! Conservatively it takes our family car nearly two years to burn that quantity of fuel. 86 years it would have taken us to use the total amount of fuel consumed on that particular journey. The attendant seemed to twig I was getting bored and actually got the only passenger in first class to come out to talk to me after that little revelation.

Imagine, 48 people on a flight that had space for over 300, I actually had an entire aircraft section to myself. It meant that I got my very own safety demonstration before we took off too. The attendant seemed a bit confused as to whether she should stand in front of me and show me how to open and close my belt buckle or whether she should perform to the other empty seats. Being an Air India flight she then had to do the whole demonstration again for the Hindi translation, which just prolonged the agony for the poor girl. I had to smile. I chuckled during the check-in too, there was a sign stating, “Do not carry these items on your person,” and then below were listed the usual suspects: sharp objects, flammables, compressed gas, etc. but there, tucked away at the end, were a couple of pictures I wasn’t used to seeing: a hand grenade and a glowing stick of radioactive material. A sign of the times perhaps?

Anyway, while I’m on the subject of air travel, a few things have occurred to me over the past few days:

1) When has anyone had to use the life vests or the inflatable rafts? In the history of commercial air travel how many times has an aircraft successfully landed on water? I’ll tell you. Once. November 23, 1996 when a hijacked Ethiopian Airlines 767 ditched into the sea – there were 52 survivors. Even then the plane partially broke up. From my understanding aircraft do not glide like ducks onto the surface of the sea, it’s more like hitting a hillocky field of concrete at 150mph. Instead of hearing, “Life vests can be found under your seats,” during the safety briefing wouldn’t it be better to hear, “In the event of an emergency controlled explosives will blow out the emergency doors located here, here and here; parachutes can be found under your seats.” Personally I would rather take my chances bailing out at 10,000 feet.

2) On the subject of hard landings, why not make the seats rear facing? And what’s with those whiplash belts you wear across the midriff? Even cars strap you in across the chest and they’re only doing 70-80mph at the best of times.

3) Oxygen masks. My guess is that rapid decompression would probably blow out most people’s eardrums; the last thing on your mind would be calmly placing one of those dangly yellow bags around your mouth before attending to your little one. Nevertheless, assuming all’s well there and you’ve made it to the ground in one piece, you then have to find your emergency exit – through the toxic fumes. But your mask is only attached to its supply by a short umbilical. Smoke inhalation is one of the biggest killers in an airline accident (aside from the obvious impact) so why not have detachable gas masks? I know, I know, it’s too expensive and probably only a solution for the first and business class passengers but Britain managed to supply an entire nation with masks during WW2, surely there must be loads left over from back then?

4) It's been drilled into us that mobile phones interfere with aircraft communication systems and must be turned off, but I'm sure that a few people must leave them on accidentally - left in bags and jacket pockets. And Singapore Airlines for one now has wireless internet access available on their flights and will soon have a system in place to let you use your mobile phones in-flight too. So what's the big cover up? Do phone signals really interfere with aircraft systems?

5) Why did I get a plastic knife with my food but a metal fork?

I’m sure I’ve put a few of you off flying for now so I’ll wrap it there. It’s also time for another circuit of the aisles to move that blood clot a little further up my leg...

(click to enlarge)